

"Talking to the writer, Clint [Eastwood] stressed the lack of grandeur in his background. "My dad was Scots-English; my mother's Dutch-Irish. Strange combination. All the pirates and people who were kicked out of every place else." In other words, there are no Eastwoods in the Society of Mayflower Descendants. It is sometimes Clint's pleasure to slightly overemphasize his lack of early promise..." Schickel, page 19
*Update from author, Steve Eastwood
As stated above by Eastwood friend and biographer, Richard Schickel, Clint takes pleasure in emphasizing the lack of grandeur in his heritage. True, Clint was raised, as was I, by hard working, middle class parents who provided all the essentials necessary to raise an educated, healthy, motivated family with a sound ethical background. Granted, neither Clint nor myself were meeting young society ladies at Debutante Balls, much less driving a Mercedes Benz to high school. However, we both were fortunate enough to have loving parents who provided all the essentials required to raise children equipped to face the future with a sound, spiritual, outlook. I'm sure Clint would whole-heartedly agree with this assessment. But, let's return to our Eastwood ancestors.
"All the pirates and people who were
kicked out of every place else."
I laughed at the irony of this
statement. Our last common ancestor, Asa Eastwood (1781-1870), together with his
older brother, John, served on the United States' very first warship, the famed
frigate USS
CONSTELLATION
which aggressively defended America's right of safe
passage on the seas for US merchant ships.
Their participation in the US's naval victories
in the Barbary Wars
with Tripoli (1801), and many battles
against piracy in the Caribbean Sea, served notice to the world
that the United States would defend her honor and freedom at all costs.
- So much for Clint's claim to pirate ancestors.
"...people who were kicked out of every
place else." Once again, I have to take issue with cousin Clint's claim. My
DNA test results,
proved conclusively what Asa Eastwood had claimed in his diary in the 1800's, we
are direct descendants of Richard Eastwood, the
first known Eastwood in America. In 1642, Richard, together with his wife
Elizabeth (both barely 20 years old), braved over four and a half months on the
open seas to immigrate from England to the first English colony in America,
Jamestown. Upon arrival to the "New World"
(May 22, 1642), they acquired 400 acres of
choice farmland on Indian Creek a
western branch of the Nansamund
River, in what would soon become Norfolk County, in
the State of Virginia. The grants had been issued by the colony's new
Government. If that isn't enough to debunk Clint's claim to ancestral riff-raff,
I might go further back in our ancestry to Eastwoods before the colonization of
America. Clint stated that his Eastwood ancestors were Scots-English, which
is what my father, Robert B. Eastwood, great grandson of Asa, had told me, as
well. My dad also included Irish when discussing our heritage. At this point in
time, I have yet to locate any Scottish ancestors, but I have uncovered a line
of English which migrated to Ireland in the
mid 1600's. John Eastwood, originally from Nottinghamshire, England,
settled with his family in Louth County,
Ireland. He established his residence at Castletown Castle,
and eventually became the Mayor of Dublin, Ireland in 1658.
OH NO,
SORRY CLINT!
"It isn't quite true, as Richard Schickel wrote, that 'there are no Eastwoods
in the Society of Mayflower Descendants', although that nicely burnishes the
aura of an underdog. The first paternal forebear arrived in America early in the
seventeenth century, and Eastwoods were among the early pioneers heading West.
Originally, Yankees, Puritans and Easterners, family relations spread out and
pushed into New York, Ohio, Michigan, Virginia, Illinois, Louisiana, Kansas,
Colorado, Nevada, California and Alaska... They chartered new towns, erected
prairie churches, held local office, wore peacekeeping badges..."
from: McGilligan, pages 2-3:
ANOTHER UPDATE FROM STEVE EASTWOOD
However, Clint's maternal genealogy not only directly links him to
"The Mayflower", it links him to the #1 man himself, Gov. William Bradford. I
have seen numerous references to this fact, but never anything conclusive. Armed
with my growing knowledge of genealogy, I decided to devote some time to get to
the bottom of this "ancestral legend". Once again, with apologies to Clint's
reference to
"all the pirates and people who were kicked
out of every place else.", what I discovered really debunks all his claims
to a scurrilous ancestry. The Ahnetafel of Clint's
mother shows much more than Clint's ancestral line to the Mayflower. He also
has
ancestors in common (James Morgan and Margery Hill)
with England's King Henry I, the late Princess
of Wales (Lady Diana), including
the likely future King of England (either Prince William
or Prince Harry).*
*
Intertwined are connections to some of America's most
aristocratic families. Included on the list are the Kelloggs, the Bartholomew
Family, and names like Hull, Parsons, the Halls, Lathrop, Smith, Steele and many
other established New England families. Once again, I can only state that, not
only is Clint not descended from lower class misfits, contrary to his
upbringing, his maternal ancestors are among America's most elite families.
See ![]()

![]()
"[Junior] ... is the son of Clinton Eastwood Sr. (whose mid-Atlantic Eastwood descent is traceable for six generations) and Margaret Ruth Runner, daughter of Waldo Errol Runner and Virginia May McClanahan."
Author's Note: The above statement from the official biography of Clint Eastwood, was accurate up until last year. However, things have changed since then. I'm in the fortunate position of being more than just a novice genealogist tracing Clint Eastwood's lineage. As Clint's third cousin (one time removed), and especially, a male Eastwood descendent, a test of my DNA
enabled long time Eastwood genealogists to establish our direct link to
America's first Eastwood, Richard (1620 - Mar 6, 1691), thereby making our
traceable lineage double from six generations to twelve. I plan to diligently
continue to pursue (both through historical research and DNA examination)
Eastwood genealogy back many more generations, hopefully through early Anglo
Saxon times. This new information establishes that, despite the fact that Clint
downplays his Eastwood heritage, the family has indeed established itself in
America at a level that follows its proud English roots.

That noted, The author (Steven Eastwood) has devoted quite
a bit of time and energy to verify the validity of his maternal heritage. Again,
as stated in Schickel's fine biography: "In other words, there
are no Eastwoods in the Society of Mayflower Descendants. It is sometimes
Clint's pleasure to slightly overemphasize his lack of early promise..."
Schickel, page 19. Though it is accurate to state that no
Eastwoods are in the "Society of Mayflower Descendents", they instead played a
prominent role in Jamestown, Virginia, instead of New England. However, Clint's
maternal line is directly traceable not only to the "Society of Mayflower
Descendents", but, I put forth the following pedigree showing that Clinton
Eastwood Jr. is the 10th great grandson of Gov. William Bradford, himself. Not
only is that a shocking bit of historical information, his maternal line is also
entwined in the family histories of both presidents George, and George W. Bush,
as well as US Presidents Rutherford B. Hayes and Grover Cleveland. To add to
that, he also has maternal ancestors (James Morgan and Margery Hill) with
a likely royal descent, linked to the late Princess of Wales, and Prince William
and Prince Harry, the probable next King of England.

Sorry, Clint!

Copyright
2006
